The South Korean and US militaries have conducted large live-fire drills near the border with North Korea – despite the North saying it will not tolerate what it calls an invasion rehearsal on its doorstep.
Thursday’s drills, the first of five rounds of live-fire exercises through mid-June, mark 70 years since the establishment of the military alliance between Seoul and Washington.
North Korea typically reacts to such major South Korean-US exercises with missile and other weapons tests.
Since the start of 2022, North Korea has test-launched more than 100 missiles but none since it fired a solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) in mid-April.
It says the tests are a response to expanded military drills between the US and South Korea, though observers say North Korea aims to advance its weapons development and then wrest greater concessions from its rivals in eventual diplomacy.
The US-South Korean firing exercises, called “combined annihilation firepower drills”, are the biggest of their kind.
The drills have been held 11 times since they began in 1977, according to the South Korean Defence Ministry.
They involved 2,500 troops and 610 weapons systems such as fighter jets, attack helicopters, drones, tanks and artillery from South Korea and the US, according to the ministry.
The most recent exercises in 2017 drew about 2,000 soldiers and 250 weapons assets from both countries.
The drills simulated artillery and aerial strikes on frontline North Korean military facilities in response to an attack.
The troops later practiced precision-guided attacks on simulated targets in the rear areas to “completely annihilate” North Korean military threats, according to a ministry statement.
It said South Korea will seek to establish “peace through overwhelming strengthen” to counter North Korean threats.
North Korea did not immediately respond to the start of the drills.
Last Friday, its state media called the drills “a typical North Korea-targeted war rehearsal”, saying it “cannot but take a more serious note of the fact” the exercises are a few miles from its frontier.
The North’s Korean Central News Agency said the US and South Korea will face unspecified “corresponding responses” to the drills.
Earlier this year, the South Korean and US militaries conducted their biggest field exercises in five years.
The US also sent the nuclear-powered USS Nimitz aircraft carrier and nuclear-capable bombers for joint exercises with South Korea.
Moon Seong Mook, an analyst for the Seoul-based Korea Research Institute for National Strategy, said North Korea could use the South Korea-US drills as a pretext to resume testing activities.
He said domestic issues such as North Korea’s push to increase agricultural production during the rice-planting season could still affect its decision on weapons tests.
“North Korea can’t help feel some burdens over the South Korea-US joint firepower drills being held for the first time in six years and in the strongest manner,” Mr Moon said.
In a meeting last month, US President Joe Biden and South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol announced steps to reinforce their deterrence capabilities such as the periodic docking of US nuclear-armed submarines in South Korea, strengthened joint training exercises and establishment of a new nuclear consultative group.
Mr Biden also issued a blunt warning that any North Korean nuclear attack on the US or its allies would “result in the end of whatever regime” took such action.
Kim Yo Jong, the powerful sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, said the Biden-Yoon agreement revealed the two countries’ “most hostile and aggressive will of action” against the North.
She threatened to further strengthen her country’s nuclear doctrine, saying: “The pipe dream of the US and South Korea will henceforth be faced with the entity of more powerful strength.”
Worries about North Korea’s nuclear programme grew after the North last year passed a law authorising preemptive use of nuclear weapons.
Many foreign experts say North Korea does not yet possess functioning nuclear-armed missiles.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here